Sunday, 13 May 2007

Rear View Mirror Housing Experts

Mike Morgan at Morgan Florida sent me another update that I can post with the exception of one small section. This update is called Rear View Mirror Experts.
Quote of the Week – F, F+, C, F, F+, B, D, F, F, F+ – Bob Toll on the Toll Brothers Conference Call as he reviewed markets assigning letter grades. Although this is not the exact order of the markets he rattled off, we heard a lot more F’s than the last time he issued a report card. No more “dancing on the bottom.” No more Kool Aid. He gave it to us loud and clear . . . providing you listened carefully.

This Week’s Update - I’ve cut this week’s update short. No sense in beating a dead horse. Call me if you would like to discuss specific companies or markets. Much of the news this week covers areas I have been discussing for 12-18 months. It’s a bit depressing to know you were right, after taking the heat along the way for being so negative . . . and now to read all about the very same issues I was discussing a year ago, as if these are brilliant forms of analysis from leading economists and research analysts. So what’s in the future. More bad news . . . but then I’m sure I’ll take more heat for being so negative again. I’m still hearing comments about how wrong I am and how isolated these markets are. Bob Toll’s comments are a perfect example. All of those F markets were F markets long before now, and many of the A,B and C markets are simply NOT. But that’s what you get from the rear view mirror.

Market Conditions – Another week of mini-good tidings . . . I think. We’ve seen a second week of increased buyer interest here in Florida, as well as from other throughout the country. Most of it is coming from traditional buyers that have school age children. This is a seasonal blip where buyers are concentrating on purchased to lock in school systems for their children for the fall. It’s certainly not anything to get excited about, but you may hear a few cheerleaders over the next few weeks. Unfortunately, this market is a trickle, and it trickles out as we approach the summer months. Moreover, even though we’re seeing traffic, we’re not seeing a bump in contracts or buyers that can get a mortgage.

Seattle – Yessiree, Seattle. My wonderful sister (a famous, carefree, glass blower in Seattle) and her Microsoft exec hubbie live in the cozy, comfort of Seattle. They’ve both boasted, as have most on Wall Street, that Seattle is in its own little world . . . and all is good. Here’s an article in the Seattle Times called Borrower, beware: Debt disaster looms as rates rise on easy-money mortgages that shows you the housing and mortgage issues are everywhere . . . it’s just a matter of time before the infection becomes visible.

I’ll be making a trip to Seattle next month for a little more color on real estate and mortgage issues.

Nationwide – The Washington Post ran a piece about the drop in prices and buyers in markets as “secure” as the Manhattan commuter areas of Connecticut. Below you will read a few things about Minneapolis, South Carolina and Georgia. It’s not just a Florida and California problem. For the rear view mirror drivers, they’ll feel the whiplash within the next 2-3 Quarters.

Conference Calls – I’m sure the analysts you work with have provided you with detailed updates on their models by now. Even though the models are rear view data, it should start to paint a picture. And if you take the time to realize how incentives are being buried in other line item areas, you’ll see how prices must continue to fall if inventory is going to drop. Unfortunately, the builders are still building more inventory than the market is absorbing. Personally, I didn’t hear much to write about on any of the calls. Toll Brothers is stepping up to the write down buffet table with $90-130 million estimate. I don’t think I can stress this issue enough. More on impairments below, as well as WCI.

Numbers – Tuesday we get the housing index from NAHB and the Commerce Department reports April housing starts Wednesday. Big deal. I can’t say any of the numbers we’ve been fed are in touch with ground-zero reality.

NAR now expects sales of previously occupied homes to fall 2.9% this year. With David Lereah given the boot, maybe NAR will start reporting numbers that are in touch with reality. (probably not) The 2.9% number is a 31.81% negative revision in the previous estimate. Almost as bad is the revised-estimate of new home sales to 864,000 units for 2007. That’s a 27.34% negative revision. Two things to remember when looking at NAR numbers. First, they use a sampling and we don’t get to see what markets are sampled. Second, quite a few Realtor Boards no longer report numbers. Naples, Florida is a perfect example. They will no longer share data.

The only way to look to the future, is to get in the car and see ground zero. I did just that this week. Forget about looking back at numbers that are unreliable.

I made a road trip to South Carolina this week for interviews with an ABC and NBC affiliate reporting on defective homes. Along the way I drove by developments in South Carolina, Georgia and Florida.

I saw an awful lot of very ugly developments with hundreds of millions of dollars in the ground for horizontal development, but no homes going vertical. And I saw an awful lot of communities half built . . . with many of the homes for sale. It’s hard to swallow the “we don’t build spec homes” garbage we hear so much on the conference calls. And even if they don’t build specs, when the buyers walk away, the builders now have a spec home.

Looking to the future, I can assure you the rest of this year is a dud. No strike that. Not a dud. This year is a live bunker busting bomb. Even if sales pick up, there is so much inventory yet to be built in undeveloped developments, that prices must drop . . . and incentives must go up . . . and margins will disappear. The alternative? Longer carrying costs, a spike in SGA and huge impairments. I’d be willing to bet we see negative numbers by Q4, and worse for Q1 and Q2 of 2008. If you sat in the car with me and saw what I saw, you’d be scratching your head. I certainly was.

I’ve got to share this with you. I was on I-95 in and hit what I thought was the smoke from the fires burning out of control in Florida and Georgia. It wasn’t the smoke. It was actually a dust storm that was being kicked up from a very large horizontally developed community with no homes. The roads and utilities were in, but everything else was dirt. And the top soil was up in the air in a dust storm. I can no longer comprehend how the builders intend to monetize this land without taking very heavy impairments. I saw the same thing in all three states.

Orlando Numbers – Even though the Orlando Sun Sentinel and other papers are now reporting about the strength in the Orlando markets attributable to a solid tourism market, the numbers show a different story . . . and ground zero is even worse. By the way, if gasoline continues the march higher, Orlando takes a heavy hit. I’ve attached a few files from the Orlando Association of Realtors. If you want more, I’ve got them. If you want to discuss the numbers and ground zero, call me. Here’s a summary of April numbers for the Orlando MSA.

Sales – 1,768 v. 3,018 in 2006 – Sales DOWN 41.42%

Listings – 24,345 v. 16,036 in 2006 – Inventory UP 52.37%

And for those that say it’s getting better, Inventory rose 3.77% from March 2006 to April 2007. While the inventory bulge might be slowing, it is still rising . . . and as you can see from the numbers above, sales are still falling. The active listings represent a 16.63 month supply in this market based on current sales.

Lawsuits – Just like I have been on the soap box about impairments and spillover, I’ve been talking about lawsuits for more than a year now. Well, the Wall Street Journal finally caught up with the story this week, revealing this is a national problem. Unfortunately, it is not limited to buyers trying to get out of contracts as they would like you to believe. The sharks are on the scent for predatory lending, mortgage fraud, defective homes and more. If you haven’t seen the WSJ piece, you should pull it from the online version. As usual, Michael Corkery and Ruth Simon did a great job . . . even if they are limited with some of the things they can report on.

Watch for much more on the shark attack. By the way, CBS 60 Minutes called again this week. They are still trying to put together a feature on mortgage fraud and predatory lending.

We’re providing them with contacts, injured parties and information. 60 Minutes will have a segment on the overall real estate market tonight. But it is also rear view.

By the way, this is not a builder-only problem. Wells Fargo recently settled a lawsuit regarding subprime lending. Credit Suisse took a big hit, and other banks have felt the stomach punch. Looking forward, as the banks are bent over from the stomach punch, they’re going to get the knock out kick in the teeth.

Spillover – A few weeks ago I mentioned Clarence Otis, CEO of Darden Restaurants, commented that housing problems are affecting their business. This week Darden announced the demise of their Smokey Bones chain. They are going to close and sell the restaurants. And it’s not just Darden. Walk into any furniture store and talk to the sales reps. Do the same at Best Buy and Circuit City, and ask them about sales of big screen TV’s and computers. Boats, cars, clothing, jewelry and more. The housing ATM is out of money.

Retail Sales – We saw some ominous numbers this week. Housing was to blame, along with gasoline prices. The housing ATM is out of money.

Foreclosures – Last week I gave it a rest, and this week I’m not so sure this horse needs to be beaten anymore. However, I think it’s important to reinforce how widespread this problem is. It is a national problem that will truly not come to a head for another 6-12 months. And then it will hit like a ton of bricks. Here’s a great link to a graphic from the Star Tribune in Minneapolis on North Minneapolis Foreclosures. Minneapolis? I don’t think you can show me any part of the country that is not being touched by foreclosures.

And here’s the bad news that is going to get much worse. According to Foreclosures.com, for April 2007 v. April 2006, first notice of foreclosure climbed 127 percent, and homes going up for sale by auction jumped 164 percent. As the housing bust spillover spreads through the economy, these numbers will skyrocket.

Oh, yes, one more thing. Most subprime mortgages have an adjustable mortgage rate and most of these loans were at teaser rates that will double, triple and quadruple mortgage payments over the next three years . . . even if interest rates remain stable. If rates rise, the problem goes nuclear. Add to the increasing mortgage payments . . . falling home prices. Negative equity is already a reality for millions of homeowners.

Rental Market – I don’t follow the REITs but I am at ground zero when it comes to looking at the rental markets. Even though Wall Street has been singing the praises of strong rental markets, we’ve seen the cracks in the foundation for more than a year. It’s the same basic Economics 101. Too much supply and not enough tenants. Here’s a link to a Bloomberg article called Rents Peak in Housing Glut

Commercial Space – Last week Barry Sternlicht commented about the strength of the commercial office space markets. No doubt Barry is one of the sharpest tacks in the box. I worked for him, and I can tell you first hand, his mind works like a computer. But you must take his comments at face value. Barry plays with the big boys in the big markets . . . New York, Chicago, and Los Angeles, as well as the hot international markets. The office space market might well be healthy in these markets. He noted the flood of hedge funds renting huge amounts of space. I just wonder how long that can last, but that is not my point.

The local commercial markets are not healthy. Once again, get in the car with me and drive around the areas surrounding the few healthy big-city markets. You’ll see a tremendous amount of vacant office space and retail space. Get in the car with me and start counting signs for strip centers that are beautiful . . . but empty. These same markets were overbuilt based on rear view mirror data for the housing markets. The commercial boys saw the number of homes going up and decided these areas needed more office and retail space. But as these residential markets fail, so do the local office and retail space markets.

One final note on Barry’s comments. He noted that the hospitality industry is now facing a cost of construction problem for new properties. Very true, so now it is better to buy existing rather than try to build new. That’s something that will certainly play out as Starwood, Hilton and Marriott look for properties or companies to buy.

Inventory – Up, Up and Away

Land Impairments – If you still buy the Conference Call color that impairments will not matter, you truly need to spend a few days with me in the field.

WCI – Needless to say, the Conference Call was a non-event for those of us looking ahead. We saw a negative number for Tower Net Orders. That negative number will continue to grow. And since WCI books revenue throughout sales and construction, this becomes a big problem.

The biggest take-away from the call was the projected and unrealistic 15% default rate for 2007. They based this on rear view mirror logic. Mosaic and Singer Island skewed these numbers.

If Mosaic had to close today, the default rate would be 25%+. The ground zero from Singer Island is not rear view, but colored glasses. The buyers I spoke with were going to close because they expected to ride the coat tails of Barry Sternlicht’s Starwood. Well, Barry’s not there anymore and the Starwood Vacation Ownership program is one of the most profitable segments of Starwood’s business model. It is not meant to generate revenue for the unit owners. The benefit to the unit owners is the lower cost of holding a unit they want to use during a part of the year. So for those folks that think they are going to generate double digit returns on their Singer Island units . . . they are in for a surprise.

Another problem at Singer Island for these owners, is the seasonality of the business. It’s a December – March business, and there is a lot of competition at better rates, in better areas for vacationers. As you can see, WCI’s 15% default rate moving forward is unrealistic. Look for the default rate on the towers moving forward to average 30%+. Just take a look at Lesina with only 77 of the 116 units sold, and just 31 of those closing. They’ve only sold 66% of the units! How about Lost Key with just 39 of the 70 units sold and only 20 closed. Here they’ve only sold 55% of the units.

At Oceanside they’ve only sold 67% of the units, and I can assure you more than half of these folks will walk away. Oceanside fails on location and value. A lot is riding on Bal Harbour. Even with 100% of the units sold, how do you explain more than a third of these units already on the MLS system for sale at prices now touching original sales prices . . . with no re-sales? As prices continue to fall in the Miami market, Bal Harbour fails with a default rate significantly higher than the 15% WCI projection.

Back to Singer Island for a moment to get some color on what you can expect at Bal Harbour. Only 12 of the 15 units at One Singer Island have sold. Although WCI claims to have sold 14, they can’t seem to get two of the units to close, and they could not sell the 15th unit. This is a tower more comparable to Bal Harbour. They’re facing a 20% default/non-closed rate here, and this was closed almost six months ago. The condo market has darkened considerably during the last six months, and it will grow much darker moving forward.

The Bright Spots

Florida East Coast – One of my favorite stocks was taken out this week. Florida East Coast (FLA). Fortress Investment is going to buy FLA for $84. A hefty 86% spike from it’s 52 week low, and a 13.3% premium from the last quote prior to the offer. This has been a favorite for two reasons. Very sharp commercial property development, and they are the largest railroad in Florida. Castro will die, Cuba will open up and FLA will see a huge surge in rail traffic. The only thing that surprises me about this buyout, is that Buffet and Gates weren’t involved, as they have announced rail purchases recently.

St. Joe – St. Joe is the largest landowner in Florida with somewhere around 800,000 acres. For years I have been keen on St. Joe and their potential . . . if they do it right. Getting into home building was not the brightest move. On the other hand, following the lead of the Griffin family, owners of Alico, would have made much more sense.

Alico is another company with large land holdings in undeveloped markets. Well, undeveloped until the Griffins realized it was smarter to put land in the hands of others to develop for an airport, university, etc. If you build it, they will come. And they did. Alico’s land holdings are primarily in Southwest Florida. By nudging along the infrastructure, they were able to monetize their citrus and cattle land and handsome profits. The problem for shareholders, was three generations of Griffins. That’s changed now, but so has the real estate market.

As for St. Joe, The New York Times hit the nail on the head this week with an article about St. Joe and the Florida Panhandle. For those of you that have been with me for awhile, you know I’ve said all along, St. Joe needs to build a destination or a city, not homes. So now, just as Alico did, St. Joe is offering 4,000 acres of land for an airport expansion. They’ve also promised 40,000 acres for preservation. But they need to take it a step further and bring in a University, a hospital with unique departments, maybe a state of the art convention center, and a few more bells and whistles to make the Panhandle something special. St. Joe is facing major hurdles from the environmentalists, but with 800,000 acres, there’s enough for everyone. St. Joe has the ability to develop something very special in Florida, that has the potential to draw Baby Boomers, second home owners, convention traffic, tourists, and more. If they build it (right), they will come. Here’s the link to the NY Times article A Bid to Bring in the Crowds.

1,000 Donuts – Back in October 2005, I made a statement analogizing the housing market to the room of 1,000 donuts. You walk in to a room full of 1,000 warm Krispy Kremes. How many can you eat? Two, three, maybe four. Any more than that, and you’ve got a belly-ache. But then they tell you, the rest of the donuts are marked down 75%. Wow, what a bargain. Can you eat any more? Not a chance. Can you take them home for later? Not a good idea. Well, it’s the same thing with housing. How many homes can you live in?

Disclosure: Of the stocks referenced today, I have a put position in Toll Brothers. I also love Krispy Kreme donuts . . . and I can only eat two.

The Shadow

Thanks Mike.

Here are links to the ABC and NBC interviews he did in South Carolina this week. The first one plays nicely and presents Lennar's side of the story as well. I could not get the second link to play.

More information can be found on his Defective Homes website.

Mike Shedlock / Mish
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

Saturday, 12 May 2007

One Idiot Stands in the Way

Polls show Most Iraqis Favor Immediate U.S. Pullout.
A strong majority of Iraqis want U.S.-led military forces to immediately withdraw from the country, saying their swift departure would make Iraq more secure and decrease sectarian violence, according to new polls by the State Department and independent researchers.

In Baghdad, for example, nearly three-quarters of residents polled said they would feel safer if U.S. and other foreign forces left Iraq, with 65 percent of those asked favoring an immediate pullout, according to State Department polling results obtained by The Washington Post.

The director of another Iraqi polling firm, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he feared being killed, said public opinion surveys he conducted last month showed that 80 percent of Iraqis who were questioned favored an immediate withdrawal. Eight-five percent of Sunnis in that poll supported an immediate withdrawal, a number virtually unchanged in the past two years, except for the two months after the Samarra bombing, when the number fell to about 70 percent, the poll director said.

"The very fact that there is such a low support for American forces has to do with the American failure to do basically anything for Iraqis," said Mansoor Moaddel, a professor of sociology at Eastern Michigan University, who commissioned a poll earlier this year that also found widespread support for a withdrawal.
A US poll shows that 72 percent of troops want out of Iraq in a year
Seventy two percent of U.S. troops in Iraq believe the United States should pull out within one year, a column by Nicholas Kristof in Tuesday's New York Times reveals. The poll was conducted by Zogby International and is the first poll to examine the attitudes of those currently serving in the wartorn nation.

Only 23 percent backed Bush's position that they should stay as long as necessary. In contrast, 72 percent said that U.S. troops should be pulled out within one year. Of those, 29 percent said they should withdraw "immediately..."

While the White House emphasizes the threat from non-Iraqi terrorists, only 26 percent of the U.S. troops say that the insurgency would end if those foreign fighters could be kept out. A plurality believes that the insurgency is made up overwhelmingly of discontented Iraqi Sunnis...

By a 2-1 ratio, the troops said that "to control the insurgency we need to double the level of ground troops and bombing missions." And since there is zero chance of that happening, a majority of troops seemed to be saying that they believe this war to be unwinnable.

This first systematic look at the views of the U.S. troops on the ground suggests that our present strategy in Iraq is failing badly. The troops overwhelmingly don't want to "stay the course," and they don't seem to think the American strategy can succeed.
A poll of U.S. citizens shows that 58 percent want U.S. troops out of Iraq by 2008.
Nearly six in ten Americans want to see U.S. troops leave Iraq either immediately or within a year, and more would rather have Congress running U.S. policy in the conflict than President Bush, according to a CNN poll out Tuesday.

The poll found most Americans support a withdrawal from Iraq, with 21 percent wanting an immediate pullout and 37 percent saying troops should be home within a year. Another 39 percent said the troops should stay in Iraq as long as needed.

They were more closely divided on the issue of funding the president's "New Way Forward," with 52 percent saying Congress should block funds for additional troops and 43 percent opposing such a move.
On May 11 2007 the Iraq parliament expressed the need for a timetable for U.S. to get out of Iraq.
A majority of Iraq's parliament has expressed support for a proposed bill that would require a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. soldiers from Iraq and freeze current troop levels.

Much like what Democrats have demanded in the U.S. Congress, the Iraq draft would create a timeline for a gradual departure and would require the Iraqi government to secure parliament's approval before further extensions of the U.N. mandate for foreign troops in Iraq, which expires at the end of 2007.

President Bush has fought similar efforts in Congress to impose a timetable for a U.S. withdrawal. He vetoed legislation last week that would have required U.S. forces to begin leaving Iraq this year. The House on Thursday passed legislation that would release $43 billion immediately for military operations but would tie future money to Iraqi approval of laws dividing oil revenues among Iraq's ethnic groups and permitting some former members of Saddam Hussein's Baath party to hold government jobs.

In both Iraq and the United States, frustration is deepening among lawmakers and the public over Bush's elevated troop levels, a policy that has yet to prevent widespread violence. At the same time, Bush and al-Maliki are dispatching emissaries in an urgent trans-Atlantic gambit to shore up support.

The draft bill is being championed by a 30-member bloc loyal to al-Sadr, and it has gained support from other Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish legislators. As many as 144 lawmakers have signed the proposal, a majority in the 275-member parliament.

"We think that America has committed a grave injustice against the Iraqi people and against the glorious history of Iraq, when they destroyed our institutions, and then rebuilt them in the wrong way," said Hussein al-Falluji, from the largest Sunni coalition in parliament, and a supporter of the timetable proposal.
Summary
  1. Iraqi citizens want the U.S. Out of Iraq
  2. U.S. Troops want the U.S. Out of Iraq
  3. U.S. citizens want the U.S. Out of Iraq
  4. Iraq parliament wants the U.S. Out of Iraq
  5. U.S. Congress wants the U.S. Out of Iraq
One idiot stands in the way.

Mike Shedlock / Mish
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

Friday, 11 May 2007

April PPI Cost Pass Thru

Let's take a look at the April PPI and see if there are any trends in what costs are being passed up the chain and what costs are not. Costs are color coded to help spot the trends.
  • PPI except Food and Energy is in Blue
  • Food is in Green
  • Changes vs. 12 months ago are in Red
  • Overall month to month PPI is in Pink
  • Energy is untouched
Intermediate and Crude Goods



Finished Goods PPI




Focusing on the three month trend of PPI except food and energy (Blue Boxes) one can see huge increases in the cost of raw materials (crude goods) of which only 1/4 or so is reflected in intermediate goods and virtually none in finished goods. Pricing pressure is non-existent.

Focusing on the annual rate of change (Red Boxes)we see about 1/3 of the costs making
their way from the crude goods level to the intermediate PPI level and almost all of that being passed on from the intermediate to the final. What prices got passed on? The answer can be found in food.

The Green Boxes (food) show a significant portion of costs being passed on and the final results (magenta) for the finished PPI seem strong correlated to food.

I am still in the camp that says food is a bargain but I have to admit that I am finally seeing prices rise in the grocery stores I shop at. Sale prices on meat are still good but non-sale prices have been inching up and in particular on fresh vegetables. For stressed out consumers rising food prices can't be considered a good thing.

In "Five Things" today, Professor Kevin Depew posted an interesting chart on the annual rate of growth of PPI Crude Foodstuffs and Feedstuffs. If you haven't seen it yet, check it out. Foodstuff is soaring. Outside of food and energy, however, there has been little passthru. But gasoline prices alone are causing some anguish and now we can add food and jobs to the picture. That is a bad mix for sure.

Mike Shedlock / Mish
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

Thursday, 10 May 2007

Retail Sales Bomb

April retail sales were expected to be weak and excuses like an early Easter and of course bad weather were lined up in advance. The big surprise however was to the downside. April was a disaster for most retailers.
Though they may have crossed their fingers for an upside surprise here and there, investors knew -- and priced into the stocks -- that the sorry combination of poor weather, an early Easter and tough year-over-year comparisons would spell trouble for the final tab of same-store sales numbers in April.

With more than three-quarters of retailers reporting to Thomson Financial, 86% of them missed expectations for same-store sales, the industry's benchmark for growth measured by receipts rung up at stores open longer than a year.

Thomson Financial's Jharonne Martis warned investors not to take the month's results to heart, urging them instead to combine March and April - what some analysts call "Mapril" -- for a clearer picture of how consumers are spending.

"April's negative (results) are not necessarily an indication that consumers are not spending or that the economy is going down," she said. "They are simply the result of the shift in the Easter calendar."
  • Walmart posted a 4.6% decline rather than the 1.1% drop expected.
  • Target's same-store sales dropped 6.1%.
  • Gap stores' results were a big blow to investors, plunging 16%, more than double the minus 7.1% estimate at Thomson Financial.
  • Banana Republic's sales were down 13% -- a big miss from the 1% decline expected.
  • American Eagle was forecast to ring up a 1.3% gain in same-stores sales. Instead, the teen-wear retailer turned in an eye-popping 10% drop in comparable-store sales, blaming all the expected factors of weather, calendar shifts and comparisons.
  • Pacific Sunwear of California same-store sales dropped 16.5%, far deeper than the minus 6.5% expected at Thomson Financial.
  • Limited Brands Inc. parent of Limited, Express, Victoria's Secret, and Bath & Body Works reported that same-store sales fell 1% rather than the forecast 1% gain.
  • Bebe Stores the trendy apparel and accessories retailer for young women reported same-store sales fell 6.5%.
  • Chico's a fashionable apparel and accessories retailer for older women, also let down investors with a 7.3% decline in comparable-store sales vs. the 0.6% dip anticipated
Huge Rise In Revolving Credit

It is interesting to note that these retail reports are on the heels of a brisk rise in revolving credit.
Consumers boosted their borrowing in March at the fastest pace in four months, showing resilience in the face of rising energy prices and a painful housing slump.

The Federal Reserve's report, released Monday, showed consumer credit increased at a brisk annual rate of 6.7 percent in March. That marked a pickup from February's 2.8 percent growth rate and was the biggest increase since November.

Use of revolving credit, primarily credit cards, rose at a sizzling pace of 9.2 percent in March. That was up from a 2.9 percent growth rate in February and was the biggest increase since November.
I talked about revolving credit in Consumer Spending Soars
This huge increase in revolving debt right in the face of a slowing economy smacks of inability to service current debt. And ability to service debt depends on jobs and rising wages. So what are consumers going to do for an encore given the slowdown in jobs and wages as discussed in
Consumers can only postpone the inevitable for so long (and even then only as long as they have a job). The slowdown in MEW (mortgage equity withdrawal) took away one leg of support, and a slowdown in jobs will take away another. Foreclosures and bankruptcies are now both set to soar.
Is Easter a lame excuse?

If this was just a result of a shift in the Easter calendar then why were the estimates so far off? Still, every time there is a dip in consumer spending, consumers come roaring back the next month. It remains to be seen if this is an outlier or not but consumers are clearly stressed.

There is one additional factor in this mess that scarcely anyone has talked about, and that is an overexpansion of stores. We have overcapacity in everything. We do not need more Home Depots, Lowes, Walmarts, Pizza Huts, or anything. But as long as stores were expanding, jobs were added to the economy and that kept consumers spending.

Ponzi Expansion Process
  • Build new housing subdivisions
  • Retail stores follow
  • Those stores hire people
  • Those stores stock merchandise
  • Truckers and shippers are kept busy
  • Retail and trucking jobs pick up the slack from the loss of manufacturing jobs
The flaw in the process above should be obvious. Commercial construction follows residential construction with a lag. The pullback in capital spending suggests that once the buildout of stores now in progress is complete there will be no driver for jobs going forward.

With any sustained pullback in consumer spending, the massive overcapacity in retail stores will become rudely apparent. Perhaps this is finally it or perhaps not but eventually those stores that were busy hiring because of expansion are going to have to start laying people off. All the pieces are in place for one heck of a nasty consumer led recession. Unfortunately few are prepared for it.

This post originally appeared in Whiskey & Gunpowder. Also writing about the disaster in retail was Minyanvlle's Jeff Macke with a very nice Retail Roundup.

Mike Shedlock / Mish
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

Congress Targets China on Currency Manipulation

The LA Times is reporting Congress to press China over its undervalued currency.
Democrats in Congress have been pushing an ambitious trade agenda, promising to assist displaced American workers and reduce the trade deficit. Now they're taking on the global currency market — vowing to pass legislation to punish China and other Asian countries for undervaluing their currencies.

One economist urged Congress to act quickly to level the global economic playing field. "The risk of inaction is much greater than the risk of decisive, progressive action," said C. Fred Bergsten, director of the Peterson Institute for International Economics and a former Treasury Department official.

Bergsten said the yuan needed to rise about 35% against the dollar during the next few years to reduce the annual U.S. current account deficit by about $150 billion.

He noted that the U.S. trade deficit hit $836 billion last year, a historical high, including a $233-billion deficit with China alone.

On Wednesday, Rep. Sander Levin (D-Mich.), who chaired the joint hearing, focused on a proposal by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-El Cajon) and Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio) favored by manufacturers. The legislation would slap tariffs on countries whose industries benefit from currency manipulation and force the Bush administration to hold China accountable for violating past trade agreements that bar currency manipulation.

It would be a radical move for Congress, which has rarely attempted to legislate changes in currency markets, said Peter Morici, an economist at the University of Maryland.

But Morici said Congress was well equipped to grasp the risks of currency manipulation to the U.S. manufacturing sector and to shape and evaluate legislation. He said it would be akin to writing a complex tax package.

"They don't have to be international economists to vote for this," Morici said.

"This is not something the markets can fix because the markets are being thwarted by other countries," said Thea Lee, the AFL-CIO's policy director in Washington.

"The United States runs trade deficits not because it is victimized by unfair competition from China or anyone else but because it suffers from a chronic shortfall of domestic saving," said Stephen S. Roach, chief economist at Morgan Stanley, calling legislation such as the Ryan-Hunter bill a "policy blunder of monumental proportions."
Apparently it is not manipulation for the US to slash interest rates to 1% and Japan to 0% but it is manipulation to peg to another currency. Can someone tell me why setting interest rates in a soviet command style manner is not manipulation? What about our crop supports? Our massively counterproductive ethanol policy? Is it only manipulation when the other guy does it?

The idea that Congress is well equipped to grasp the risks of currency manipulation is as frightening as it is absurd. Long time Mish readers know where I stand on this: with Roach. The problem is not that the rest of the world consumes too little the problem is the US consumes too much.

Anyone who thinks raising prices on goods from China by 35% will solve our problems belongs in an insane asylum, not Congress. This proposed legislation would have the same effect that the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act had in exacerbating the great depression. Bush no doubt would veto such legislation, but will the next Democrat president sign such a bill or not?

Protectionism is not the answer. The first country that totally embraces free trade regardless of what any other country does will be a huge winner. But it's not just Congress in La-La-Land, check out the inane comments coming from our treasury department.

Reuters is reporting low Japan yen value stems from deflation.
A senior U.S. Treasury Department official said on Wednesday the low value of Japan's yen was caused by a lengthy bout of deflation from which Japan still is recovering, not from manipulation.

"The yen's real effective value is the result of a protracted bout of deflation in the Japanese economy that coincided with rising prices in the United States and other trading partners of Japan," Deputy Assistant Treasury Secretary Mark Sobel said in prepared remarks for delivery at a hearing in the U.S. House of representatives.

He said Japanese officials have not intervened in currency markets to affect the yen's value since March 2004 and said it was important for the rest of the world that Japan have time to regain more economic vigor.

"One of the most important contributions Japan could make to the global economy, and to U.S. firms and workers, would be to resume sustainable and robust domestic demand growth and exit completely from deflation," Sobel said.

Sobel, who plays a key role in assembling Treasury's semi-annual reports on currency practices of key trade partners, repeated that China was not moving rapidly enough toward a flexible currency that would let its value rise in response to its growing economic might.

He said Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who will play host to a delegation of top-level Chinese officials in a second round of "strategic economic dialogue" talks on May 22-24, will drive home the point that the rest of the world wants action.

"Secretary Paulson has told his Chinese counterparts repeatedly that the greater risk is in China moving too slowly," Sobel said, "The secretary will again emphasize this message during the upcoming meeting of the strategic economic dialogue."
Since Sobel has no beef with Japan, one also must conclude that we want a weak Yen (to prolong the carry trade), but a strong Renmimbi on the misguided assumption that somehow it will save US manufacturers. It won't. And Paulson is going to drive home the point that the rest of the world wants action. Haven't we been driving home that point for years?

I am not the only one shaking my head over these comments by Sobel and Paulson. Let's review some key points made about the Yen by Professor's Scott Reamer and Kevin Depew in today's "Five Things".
  • A senior U.S. Treasury Department official, in prepared remarks at a U.S. House of Representatives hearing yesterday, said that the low value of the Japanese yen was caused by a lengthy bout of deflation and not from manipulation.
  • Wait, let's think about this for a moment.
  • That would mean that, at least according to the U.S. Treasury's understanding of deflation, the declining value of the yen was caused by the fact its purchasing power was increasing. What? Really?
  • Look, there may be some irrational aspects to global macro finance, but one thing is for sure: deflation does not cause a country's currency to decline... not without intervention.
  • Minyanville Professor Scott Reamer and I were discussing this very thing this morning.
  • He put it very succinctly: "Look, the three weakest currencies in the world are the U.S. dollar, the yen, and the yuan. (1) We print too much and the USD is a global reserve, currency, and (2) China and Japan both intervene massively to keep their currencies artificially low. Those policies together have combined to create the credit led hyperinflation of assets we have seen."
  • It's actually easy to understand when seen that way.
  • Those policies, and the market's embracing of them (via the yen carry trade, among other things) is what leads to asset hyperinflation (homes, stocks, CDOs, etc).
  • If those policies end because officials don't want them anymore (BOJ, PBOC changing policy, for example, or due to protectionist issues), or if market participants carry those policies too far, then you get instability and a reversal of those policies regardless of what the governments want.
  • "And that's when you get the opposite of what drove the speculation in the first place - the end game," Scott notes. "A deflationary credit contraction."
The end game has long been set in stone. The only things in question are how silly things get with leveraged buyouts and debt funded stock buybacks in the meantime, and whether or not Congress passes another Smoot-Hawley type bill in response.

This post originally appeared in Minyanville.

Mike Shedlock / Mish
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, 9 May 2007

Housing Bright Spots

Amidst all the doom and gloom of housing warnings, there is some exciting news on Housing Bright Spots as commented on by Toll Brothers.
Toll Brothers Inc. said Wednesday that it doesn't expect to meet its full-year profit outlook and that more stringent lending standards as a result of problems in subprime mortgages are reverberating in its own luxury-home market.

The Horsham, Pa.-based company (TOL) reported preliminary results ahead of its full financial results for the second quarter, scheduled for release on May 24. For the quarter ended April 30, Toll said home-building revenue fell 19% from a year earlier, while net signed contracts dropped 25%.

"Twenty months into this housing downturn, we continue to face difficult conditions in most of our markets," said Robert Toll, the company's chief executive, in a statement.

Toll said it doesn't expect to meet its latest 2007 full-year profit outlook, which it had pegged in a range of $1.46 to $1.85 a share. It also said it anticipates reporting a profit for the second quarter.

Analysts polled by Thomson Financial are looking for earnings of $1.41 a share and 42 cents a share, respectively.

CEO Toll also cited as "bright spots" a handful of markets -- New York City, Hoboken and Jersey City, N.J.; Dutchess County in New York; southeastern Connecticut; the Philadelphia metropolitan area; Raleigh, N.C.; Dallas and Austin, Texas, and parts of Northern California.
So... Toll anticipates reporting a profit for the second quarter. It seems to me the wording is in question. Will they or won't they? But thank God for bright spots like New York City.

Let's take a look at those bright spots. Bloomberg is reporting Home Prices Fall in Rich New York Suburbs Once Immune to Slump.
The U.S. housing slump has hit New York City's richest suburbs.

The average price in Westport, Connecticut, home of chief executive officers Herbert Allison of TIAA-CREF and Jeffrey Kindler of Pfizer Inc., and actor Paul Newman, fell 8.2 percent to $1.56 million in the first four months of 2007 from the same period last year, according to multiple listing service data. In Chappaqua, New York, where Bill and Hillary Clinton live, properties sit on the market an average of seven months before they sell, up from five months a year ago.

Wealth and excellent credit have until now spared bedroom communities in New Jersey, Connecticut and New York's Westchester County from declines in home prices. Now the tightening of credit in response to rising subprime defaults has disrupted the real estate food chain, bringing the national housing slump to Manhattan's doorstep. Prices fell as much as 18.8 percent this year in 15 of the 24 areas in which data was collected.

The biggest price declines are along the Metro-North Railroad line in Westchester County, New York, just north of New York City. Prices fell in eight of the 11 areas in which data was collected.

Larchmont and Mamaroneck experienced a drop of 18.8 percent to $1.08 million. In Armonk, prices declined 17.3 percent to $1.39 million. In Bronxville, the slide was 12.4 percent to $1.34 million. Prices also fell in New Rochelle (4.3 percent), Scarsdale (6 percent) and the Jefferson Valley-Shrub Oak- Yorktown-Yorktown Heights area (6.9 percent).
Anyone who did not expect this is the greater fool. More to the point, we are only in the third inning with the big decline yet to come.

Mike Shedlock / Mish
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/

Money Supply is Soaring ... Right?



The above chart shows that money supply as measured by M3 is soaring. I suppose one could nitpick about the latest drop from +12% annual rate of growth to +10% annual rate of growth but seriously that would be just nitpicking.

So money supply is soaring ... Right? Not so fast. Let's take a look at M Prime. I first talked about M Prime in Money Supply and Recessions. M Prime is based on Austrian economic theory that distinguishes money from credit. Those interested in the details can click on the previous link, but essentially M Prime approximates M1 with sweeps added back in.

Sweeps are automated processes whereby banks clear (sweep) excess funds from checking account nightly into other accounts so that it can be lent out. Sweeps originated in 1994 and with sweeps the last semblance of any sort of reserves went right out the window.

With the minor exception of things like travelers checks accounting, M Prime is pretty much a reconstitution of what M1 looked like prior to 1994. Here are a few charts.



Long Term M Prime



Real (CPI Adjusted) M Prime



Note: The latest sweeps data we have is from March. That data was extrapolated forward through the first week in May. A quick look at the above charts will show this is likely to be a minor consequence. Thanks to economist Frank Shostak for the idea behind M Prime. Thanks to Bart at NowAndFutures for reconstructing M3 and for the charts in this post.

Hmmm. M3 is soaring while M Prime is contracting... So what's it all mean?

What does it mean?
  • Credit is expanding rapidly but with fractional reserve lending via sweeps and other mechanisms such as GSE debt creation and various carry trades, actual money itself is now contracting.
  • This is further proof that the Fed has now totally lost control. What else can it mean when credit is soaring in the face of what otherwise appears to be rather tight monetary policy?
  • The distinction between money and credit is significant. A huge expansion in money supply leads to hyperinflation like the Weimar Republic or Zimbabwe.
  • A huge expansion in credit eventually leads to things like the tulip mania implosion, the railroad bust, and the great depression.
  • The Fed will fight this tooth and nail but right now their hands are tied. When the Fed starts lowering rates to combat this malaise, look for gold to soar.
  • Long term, there is no way out. The policies of Greenspan and Bernanke will be repudiated.
Many eyes are focused on M3 but my eyes are also watching M Prime. And while I still think M3 will eventually implode, the contraction in M Prime right now tells two stories.
  1. How the Fed that has totally lost control of credit
  2. How much credit expansion it takes to grow jobs and the GDP at very anemic rates
The kicker to this mess is that the current round of leveraged buyouts will soon lead to a contraction in jobs. Those LBOs are being funded by reckless increases in debt (the same thing that fueled subprime lending and the housing bust). To pay back that debt will require a cutback in expenses. A cutback in expenses invariably means a cutback in jobs and expansion. Look for many of these deals to default and for various pension plans chasing yield to be left holding the bag.

This post originally appeared in Minyanville. Jeffrey Cooper on Minyanville is writing about Hoofy in La La Land. You may wish to check it out.

Mike Shedlock / Mish
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/